Team Development with TFS - Final Release

Rating:        Based on 17 ratings
Reviewed:  13 reviews
Downloads: 156742
Released: Aug 6, 2007
Updated: Aug 6, 2007 by mycodeplexuser
Dev status: -not yet defined by owner-

Recommended Download

Documentation TFSGuide.2007-08-02.2.pdf
documentation, 6646K, uploaded Aug 6, 2007 - 156742 downloads

Release Notes

Team Development with Visual Studio Team Foundation Guide - PDF Version.
Click the link below to download the guide.

Reviews for this release

     
Thank you very much for releasing this doc.
by linkmanishgupta on Aug 11, 2013 at 5:30 AM
     
Excellent document, but really needs updating for TFS 2010 as soon as possible...I'm sure it's on your ToDo list ;-)
by RedDwarf on Jun 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM
     
This guide has different information (other than branching) that still needs to be updated for 2010.
by wrgflyfish on Feb 1, 2011 at 6:04 PM
     
There are many request for this to be updated for TFS 2010. In fact the Microsoft VS ALM Rangers have done exactly that: http://tfsbranchingguideiii.codeplex.com/
by wheys on Jan 27, 2011 at 5:54 PM
     
PLEASE UPDATE THIS GUIDE TO FIT FOR 2010 VERSION
by ruddy on Dec 31, 2010 at 2:17 AM
     
hope there will be a newer version for TFS2010 released
by imkevinyang on Nov 22, 2010 at 1:53 AM
     
It'd be nice to see this get updated for TFS 2010?
by jamiegs on Oct 22, 2010 at 5:05 PM
     
Simply Superb...
by chanduvsc on Mar 30, 2010 at 11:19 AM
     
Fantastic Reference! Thanks to the P&P Team members who spent the time to get this out to community. Should be required reading for anyone who wants to leverage the full power of TFS.
by eegestad on Jan 15, 2010 at 9:52 PM
     
Thank you very much.
by aroder on Sep 8, 2009 at 9:00 PM
     
Really good document. All i needed to know about VSTS usage is there!!! Excellent work!
by ChauhanDigvijay on May 29, 2009 at 11:48 AM
     
Everything I ve ever dream obut was here,guys you are heroes.
by aus1977 on Jan 28, 2009 at 2:11 PM
     
Everything I need for getting started was in the document.
by alex_sefrin on Nov 18, 2008 at 10:11 AM